Justia Cases

Justia Cases - 2025 united states supreme court opinions. The case involves the protecting americans from foreign adversary controlled applications act, which. The defendants, namrata patnaik and kartiki parekh, served as the chief executive officer and human resources manager of a semiconductor chip design consulting and staffing. Third, this is not a case where the government otherwise seeks to take “unusual coercive action” against an individual. Price waterhouse, 490 u. S. , at 253 (plurality opinion). Rather, the ‘minimum’ our cases have accepted is a showing that the statute is invalid ‘in the generality or great majority of cases. ’ ” (people v. Buenrostro (2025) 6 cal. 5th 367, 388. Sometimes referred to as the “work horses” of the federal courts, the us federal district courts hear both civil and criminal federal cases on the trial level. Established by congress, the. Free database of u. s. Court of appeals for the first circuit case law, court opinions & decisions from justia Find case law from federal and state courts in the united states, including the us supreme court and lower courts. Located in the hague, netherlands, the icj may resolve disputes between states and provide advisory opinions on legal questions. Justia dockets & filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. Justia provides a free collection of all u. s. Supreme court decisions from 1791 to the present. We also offer opinion summaries, briefs, oral argument audio, and resources that provide a. 824 was enacted to implement the. Justia is an american website specializing in legal information retrieval.

2025 united states supreme court opinions. The case involves the protecting americans from foreign adversary controlled applications act, which. The defendants, namrata patnaik and kartiki parekh, served as the chief executive officer and human resources manager of a semiconductor chip design consulting and staffing. Third, this is not a case where the government otherwise seeks to take “unusual coercive action” against an individual. Price waterhouse, 490 u. S. , at 253 (plurality opinion). Rather, the ‘minimum’ our cases have accepted is a showing that the statute is invalid ‘in the generality or great majority of cases. ’ ” (people v. Buenrostro (2025) 6 cal. 5th 367, 388. Sometimes referred to as the “work horses” of the federal courts, the us federal district courts hear both civil and criminal federal cases on the trial level. Established by congress, the. Free database of u. s. Court of appeals for the first circuit case law, court opinions & decisions from justia Find case law from federal and state courts in the united states, including the us supreme court and lower courts. Located in the hague, netherlands, the icj may resolve disputes between states and provide advisory opinions on legal questions. Justia dockets & filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts.